A brief history of Haiti: how natural are “natural disasters”?
Natural disasters are usually understood as acute environmental events caused by forces of nature. In the development world, they are distinguished from “complex emergencies”, with the latter generally involving a form of politically-induced conflict.
The distinction between these two kinds of crises is useful in understanding what types of humanitarian and political responses are appropriate to different kinds of emergencies; but it can also lead to an oversimplification of how natural disasters are presented and understood.
The 7.0 earthquake that rocked Haiti on January 12th was a geological phenomena that would have caused damage in any country. But oversimplifying the events as a “natural disaster” alone conceals the complex political, social, demographic and economic conditions that contributed to the magnitude of destruction.
The human choices that contributed to this catastrophe are an essential part of how this story came to unfold in Haiti. In the onslaught of media coverage about the earthquake, it is worth questioning how “natural” the disaster really is.

Photo Credit: BBC 2004
The reality that Haiti is the poorest country in the Western hemisphere has been regularly highlighted by journalists and aid workers, but what does this fact actually mean? The truth is that the structural inequalities in Haiti run far deeper than the foundations of it’s fallen buildings.

Photo Credit: BBC 2004
Like most developing countries, there is an enormous gap between the rich and the poor in Haiti. Approximately half of country’s wealth is controlled by 1% of the french speaking population, while 80% of the Creole speaking population lives below the poverty line.
Over half of the population lives in conditions of abject poverty. A recent article in the Globe and Mail quotes pre-quake surveys showing that just over half of inhabitants had variable access to electricity, and only 1 in 5 residents had access to piped water in downtown Port-au-Prince.
Haiti’s political history is equally grim. The country endured a brutal dictatorship under Francois “Papa Doc” Duvalier and his son, Jean-Claude, or “Baby Doc” whose oppressive 29-year “kleptocracy” killed thousands. American occupation, rebellion, UN intervention, and continuous military and foreign-backed “regime change” (most notably of democratically elected Jean-Bertrand Artiside), round out the recent political history of the country.
The economy has not fared much better. Haiti’s agricultural and manufacturing sectors have been adversely affected by corruption, mass deforestation, trade embargoes and unequal incorporation into global trade networks. Add on the imposition of neo-liberal economic reforms, debt repayments and weak or non-existent social security programs and you’re left with a series of seriously unfortunate human-induced events and a long list of responsible parties. However just because Haiti has a history filled with political and economic challenges not not mean that the country is destined to remain fragile and poor.

Photo Credit: BBC 2004
It is easier to think of the crisis in Haiti as a result of an uncontrollable force of nature, but a closer look at the situation indicates that there is much more to the story. It is certainly simpler to talk about “rebuilding” Haiti back better- but how far will the Haitian government and the international community go to tackle the structural problems at the roots of this crisis to ensure that the outpouring of foreign aid and assistance amount to more than a short-term band-aid solution?

















0 Comments
You can be the first one to leave a comment.